 |
Back
to web version
Teledesic
Broadband Center

Figure 1: Teledesic Broadband Center |
Building
Design Features
Underfloor
Air Distribution System Characteristics
UFAD System Performance
|
Building
Use:
The Teledesic Broadband Center is a high-tech single story office
building retrofitted from a food distribution warehouse.
Design Team
|
Owner/developer:
|
Teledesic
|
|
Architect:
|
NBBJ
- Seattle
|
|
Mechanical
design:
|
Arup
- San Francisco
|
|
Contractors:
|
McKinstry
- Seattle
|
|
Consultants:
|
Arup
- San Francisco: Electrical, Structural, Mechanical
Allworth/Nusbaum: Landscape
Michael Yantis: Acoustical |
|
Location:
Bellevue (Seattle), WA
Size:
Main Floor = 6,600 m2
(71,000 ft2)
Mezzanine = 1,770 m2
(19,000 ft2)
Construction
Status:
The building has been occupied since fall of 1999. |
Building
Design Features
This project, shown and
depicted in Figures 1-10, involved the conversion of a food distribution
warehouse to office space for a technology company. Constructed from tilt-up
concrete walls, the tall floor-to-ceiling height of 7.6 m (25 ft) enabled a
mezzanine area of 1,770 m2 (19,000 ft2) to be added above
the main floor.
Although areas of glazing are kept to a minimum on the north and south
elevations at 10-15%, the west elevation comprises 40-50% glazing. Throughout
the main floor plan, workstations are provided with task lighting to augment
suspended HID lighting, while suspended direct/indirect fluorescent fixtures
provide background lighting on the mezzanine.
Within the overall ‘modern industrial’ interior design theme, modular
furniture configurations define workstations in the open-plan office areas,
which also include open team spaces and traditional closed conference rooms.

Figure 2: Main Floor Interior |

Figure 3: Typical Workstation |
Top
Underfloor
Air Distribution System Characteristics
Design
Intent
Specifying a UFAD system was somewhat of an obvious choice for this
particular project. While the high ceiling-to-floor height would have presented
a number of problems in terms of installing a conventional overhead system, it
provides the opportunity to promote vertical stratification of room air in the
upper levels (above the occupied zone), a characteristic of UFAD systems.
Architecturally, concealing of HVAC components within the underfloor plenum
contributes to creating an expansive, uncluttered interior, improving the
visual and spatial character of the workplace.
Design/Configuration
| Plenum
Height: |
0.45
m (18 in.) |
| Diffuser
Types: |
Swirl
diffuser (core/interior zone), supplied by Trox; linear grille
(perimeter zone), supplied by Titus. |
| Raised
Floor: |
0.61
m x 0.61 m (24 in. x 24 in.) concrete-core panel, supplied by Interface. |
Supply
Air
Temperature: |
Nominal
18°C (65°F), varies with load |
UFAD
System
Types: |
Constant
volume, variable temperature (CAV-VT) in perimeter and interior zones.
yes"> Passive floor diffuser in the interior, fan powered
mixing boxes at perimeter. |
Throughout most of the
building, the UFAD system serving the various zones is similar in design and
operation. In order to minimize the ductwork required, the east and west ends
of the building each accommodate an air handling unit (AHU) supplied with
chilled water from a roof mounted air-cooled chiller. The AHU delivers air at a
nominal 18°C (65°F) to the plenum serving the entire office space, as shown
in Figure 4, with the exception of two zones: 1.
The north perimeter zone accommodating a combination lounge, library and
reception area; and
2. A
computer room equipped with a separate ‘computer room A/C’ unit.
The
Teledesic building features a 0.45 m (18 in.) high plenum with concrete core
raised floor system throughout. Although the conference rooms are the only area
for which the plenum is partitioned, the various spatial zones are defined both
by different floor diffuser types, and a variety of access floor surface
finishes. Within workplace areas, 0.61 m square (24 in.) carpet tiles, laid
non-coincident with the floor panels, are used with swirl diffusers in the
interior/core zones and linear bar grille diffusers in perimeter zones.
Circulation areas retain the concrete floor panel as a finished floor surface,
although at least one corridor has a poured concrete surface on top of the
access floor. Within the plenum, cabling is substantial due to the high degree
of computer related work being done at Teledesic, and plenum cable trays are
elevated to the top most portion of the plenum (See Figure 5). Figure 6 shows
electrical distribution junction boxes in the plenum from which flexible whips
emanate to feed floor panel mounted electric and telecom access modules.

Figure 5: Cable Tray |

Figure 6: Electrical Distribution |
Plenum
partitioning has only been used for the large conference room, however
‘air-highways’ made from sheet metal troughs are used to help evenly
distribute air through the plenum. In the mezzanine area these air-highways are
insulated to de-couple them from the floor slab. The mezzanine area has
its own air-handling unit, which allows this area to be supplied at a slightly
lower temperature. A concrete filled metal deck separates the ceiling space of
the ground floor from the mezzanine plenum. Stratified warm air in the ground
floor ceiling space will transfer heat into the mezzanine plenum so the supply
air needs to be cooler to compensate; thus the need for insulating the
mezzanine level air highways.
Operation
The core area is operated as a constant volume, variable temperature (CAV-VT)
system whose supply air temperature is controlled by a number of sensors
located in the interior zone and linked to the AHU via an Alerton
energy-management system. As the structure is essentially single story,
significant heat loss through the roof in the winter causes a variation in the
required supply air temperature between 18-21°C (65-70°F) throughout the
year.

Figure 7: West Perimeter Diffusers |

Figure 8: North Lounge Area |
Under
normal operating conditions air is returned to the AHU via return grilles
located near the ceiling. Alternatively, when the system is using outside air,
in an economizer mode, return air is exhausted via a roof relief damper.
Cooling air is supplied to the north perimeter zone through linear diffusers
located in the kick plate of the cabinets; these diffusers incorporate a
two-position damper that minimizes plenum air delivery during heating. Finned
tube convectors located along the external wall provide heating for this
exposure.
Other perimeter zones are operated as a CAV-VT system by the use of variable
air volume (VAV) fan-powered mixing boxes. During intermediate load conditions,
room air is drawn into the plenum through linear diffusers located towards the
interior of the perimeter zone, mixed with fresh plenum supply air and
re-emitted through diffusers at the perimeter of the zone. Note that although
each zone operates as CAV, for the system overall, the supply air volume varies
to some degree as the fan-powered boxes reduce the percentage of plenum air
used.
In winter, the percentage of plenum air used is the minimum necessary to
satisfy fresh air requirements, with re-circulated room air comprising the
majority of the volume of supply air.
In contrast to the open plan work areas, the conference rooms are enclosed
spaces. yes"> Two large conference rooms are located
peripherally, adjacent to the west external wall; two small rooms are located
towards the interior of the plan. The difference between large and small is not
only attributed to their size and location, but also in the configuration of
UFAD systems serving each.

Figure
9: Large Conference Room
The
large conference room, shown in Figure 9, is the only space in which the plenum
is partitioned (with the exception of the computer room, which is partitioned
as a separate system). Operated as a VAV system in response to signals from a
room thermostat, supply air is ducted directly from the AHU to a VAV box
serving this plenum zone.

Figure 10: Small
Conference Rooms
The small
conference room, illustrated in Figure 10, uses a method similar to that used
in the core areas where plenum air is supplied to the space via a set of swirl
diffusers. However, ducting connects another set of diffusers to a small
variable speed fan, operated by a multi-step manual control switch. This
enables occupant control over the level of cooling provided, a unique feature
for a relatively intermittently occupied space such as a conference room.
Top
UFAD
System Performance
Although
the building is not fully occupied, our case study efforts confirm that this
building operates extremely well. The relatively simple design, high degree of
temperature uniformity, lack of complaints, low noise, and the minimum need for
adjustment all attest to the success of this design.
CBE Findings
(These comments reflect the views of CBE researchers based on a limited
study of the building and do not necessarily represent those of the designers
and/or owners.)
The installation of air-highways, or ducting, in the plenum was considered
necessary to evenly distribute air in large floor plates.
Due to the use of fan powered VAV boxes in the perimeter zones, terminal fan
energy is consumed during both cooling and heating periods. Overall, this can
increase total fan energy consumption. yes"> However, winter
re-heating is minimized by using air that is drawn from the room and mixed with
the minimum amount of fresh plenum supply air necessary to satisfy ventilation
requirements.
Despite variable airflow within the system due to the operation of the
perimeter VAV boxes, no plenum pressure control is used. This results in some
fluctuation of the plenum pressure as the system ‘rides the fan curve’
during decreases in the cooling load.
Temperature sensors were installed in the slab with the intent of using night
purging to cool the slab in summer, thereby offsetting some of the cooling
load. It was intended that the slab temperature would be monitored and used to
coordinate reset of the supply air temperature on a daily basis. Unfortunately,
controls associated with using the floor slab for thermal storage were not
programmed properly and thus were disbanded for the main floor area. However,
it appears that this strategy was unnecessary for the ground floor areas since
the loads in the occupied portion of the space are smaller than anticipated. In
fact the supply air temperature has to be raised in cool weather to compensate
for the lack of heat gain. The mezzanine level does use night cooling and, as
discussed above, requires a lower supply temperature than the ground floor.
Accommodating the highly variable loads of conference areas by using manual
control is an interesting feature. In general it is desirable to place
intermittently occupied zones under automatic control in order to minimize
energy use and occupant interaction, as not all the persons in such a room will
be familiar with the building. However, people working in the building
primarily use the small conference rooms. The occupants are familiar with being
able to adjust their own floor diffusers, so the conference room control is
just an extension of user control. Long-term monitoring of the conference areas
would indicate the feasibility of such a departure from conventional control
methods.
So far, the large conference room has experienced some episodes of overheating
when occupied in the wintertime, possibly related to using relatively warm
plenum air (needed for core areas) when the cooling demand is high in the
conference room. This might also be related to discrepancies between reliance
on a fixed height thermostat and actual variations in the temperature profile
created when operating in VAV mode. There also may be a time delay due to the
thermal mass of the floor or sluggish control system response, which may
require that a manual override be installed to open the VAV box on demand.
Monitoring of the system would help determine the cause of this problem.
Date Reviewed: December 1999 – March 2001 (Case Study, October 2001)
|
 |